By Richard Sultan and agencies
Sudan has again witnessed another coup, number 17.
While standout condemnations have manifested from mainly the western nations, in the region, it has been coy, and the region has it’s memories of military takeovers too.
Protests denouncing the military takeover on Monday continued, sucking in workers from key sectors including oil workers and doctors continued in the capital of Khartoum and elsewhere, and many businesses shut in response to calls for strikes.
Trade unions have called for civil disobedience in response to the coup. So far, doctors, teachers and staffs of the National Oil Company Sudapet have all downed their tools.
Security forces kept up their heavy-handed response, despite mounting international pressure on the military.
The United States has suspended its 700-million-dollar aid meant for restructuring Sudan’s economy.
The AU on Wednesday rejected the military takeover as an “unconstitutional” seizure of power, and suspended Sudan from the bloc.
The World Bank later suspended aid to the East African country over the coup.
Most of Sudan’s neighbors have however been very tacit in their response.
Egypt, Tunisia, Ethiopia and a host of other African countries as well as the Arab world, especially from the gulf countries have so far been very cautious in their response.
Sudan’s coup is a stark reminder that militaries still have heavy hands across the continent.
Military coups have been a regular occurrence in Africa in the decades since independence and there is now concern they are becoming more frequent.
Sudan has this year experienced two such events, one in September which failed and the latest in which Gen Abdel Fattah Burhan dissolved the civilian arm of a transitional government and took over.
In Guinea, President Condé was ousted by the army in September and in neighbouring Mali there have been two interventions by the army in less than a year, the most recent one in May.
In Niger, a coup was thwarted in March just days before a presidential inauguration.
So are military interventions occurring more often on the continent?
When is a coup a coup?
One definition used is that of an illegal and overt attempt by the military – or other civilian officials – to unseat sitting leaders.
A study by two US researchers, Jonathan Powell and Clayton Thyne, has identified over 200 such attempts in Africa since the late 1950s.
About half of these have been successful – defined as lasting more than seven days.
Burkina Faso, in West Africa, has had the most successful coups, with seven takeovers and only one failed coup.
Sometimes, those taking part in such an intervention deny it’s a coup.
In 2017 in Zimbabwe, a military takeover brought Robert Mugabe’s 37-year rule to an end.
One of the leaders, Maj Gen Sibusiso Moyo, appeared on television at the time, flatly denying a military takeover.
In April this year, after the death of the Chadian leader Idriss Déby, the army installed his son as interim president leading a transitional military council. His opponents called it a “dynastic coup”.
“Coup leaders almost invariably deny their action was a coup in an effort to appear legitimate,” says Jonathan Powell.
Are there fewer coups now in Africa?
The overall number of coup attempts in Africa remained remarkably consistent at an average of around four a year in the four decades between 1960 and 2000.
Jonathan Powell says this is not surprising given the instability African countries experienced in the years after independence.
“African countries have had conditions common for coups, like poverty and poor economic performance. When a country has one coup, that’s often a harbinger of more coups.”
Coups dropped to around two a year in the two decades up to 2019.
We are only two years into the current decade and while in 2020 only one coup was reported, there’s been a noticeably higher than average number this year with six coups or attempted coups recorded so far.
Before the current coup in Sudan, there had been successful coups in Chad, Mali and, Guinea and failed military takeovers in Niger and Sudan.
In September, the UN Secretary-General António Guterres voiced concern that “military coups are back,” and blamed a lack of unity amongst the international community in response to military interventions.
“Geopolitical divisions are undermining international co-operation and…a sense of impunity is taking hold,” he said.
Ndubuisi Christian Ani from the University of KwaZulu-Natal says popular uprisings against long-serving dictators have provided an opportunity for the return of coups in Africa.
“While popular uprisings are legitimate and people-led, its success is often determined by the decision taken by the military,” he says.
Which countries have had the most coups?
Sudan has had the most coups and attempted takeovers amounting to 17 – five of them successful. That doesn’t include the current one, which has only just happened.
In 2019, long-serving leader Omar al-Bashir was removed from power following months of popular protest.
Bashir had himself taken over in a military coup in 1989.
Nigeria had a reputation for military coups in the years following independence with eight between January 1966 and the takeover by Gen Sani Abacha in 1993.
However, since 1999 transfers of power in Africa’s most populous nation have been by democratic election.
Burundi’s history has been marked by eleven separate coups, mostly driven by the tensions between the Hutu and Tutsi communities.
Sierra Leone experienced three coups between 1967 and 1968, and another one in 1971. Between 1992 and 1997, it experienced five further coup attempts.
Ghana has also had its share of military coups, with eight in two decades. The first was in 1966, when Kwame Nkrumah was removed from power, and in the following year there was an unsuccessful attempt by junior army officers.
Overall, Africa has experienced more coups than any other continent.
Of the 11 coups recorded globally since 2017, all but one – Myanmar in February this year – have been in Africa.
